🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an similar ban remains "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a law raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good foundation," stated one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design tools that are secure and fit for young users," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from these regions, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations take a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

Even as this international discussion continues, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers globally are less and less willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.